Ready
0 chars · 0 words
free checks per 24 hours
5
not a verdict
Signals
needed to run a check
No account

French AI detector

What the French AI detector does

This app checks French text for the patterns typical of AI-generated French writing: guillemet spacing, apostrophe style, the space before ; : ! ?, and the handful of connectors a model reaches for far more than a person does. It's built for the exact question people search, is this French text AI-written, and answers with a labelled list of signals instead of a bare score.

It runs as a server tool: your text goes to our AI server to be scored, and the flags come back explained. You get 5 free checks in any rolling 24 hours, no account needed.

The real tells

How AI-written French text actually gives itself away

French typography carries its own rules, and following or ignoring them is informative either way. None of these mean anything alone; the app reads for how many show up together.

Guillemets missing their narrow space
Correct French typesetting is « texte » with a narrow no-break space after « and before ». Straight quotes, or guillemets pressed tight against the text, both stand out.
No space before ; : ! ?
French convention places a space before these marks: « Bonjour ! Comment allez-vous ? ». Punctuation glued the English way, with no space, reads as typed without French rules applied.
A straight apostrophe throughout
Correct elision uses U+2019, l’ami, aujourd’hui, not the ASCII apostrophe '. A document perfectly consistent one way, never a mix, is itself worth noticing.
En effet and par ailleurs overused
Both are correct connectors. Reached for as a default way to open every new point, they read as filler rather than argument.
Formal connectors stacked in sequence
De plus, par conséquent, en outre, arriving one after another rather than because the logic actually calls for them.

Workflow

How to run the French AI detector on your own text in three steps

Nothing to configure, no format to match.

1. Paste your French text
A draft, a submission, a comment. A paragraph gives the check enough structure to read.
2. Run the check
The text goes to our AI server once, gets scored, and the flagged patterns come back to the page.
3. Read the flags, not just a score
Each signal ships with a plain-language reason. Use that to decide what the result means for your text.

Straight answer

Can you actually tell which AI wrote French text?

Not for certain. Most models default to the same tidy, connector-heavy French regardless of which one wrote it, often skipping the narrow-space typography a French program would apply automatically, so this app reads for machine-written French broadly, not for a single model.

Ask the same model for Québécois phrasing, or for a specific register, and much of that default shape disappears. Treat a match as worth a closer look, not as a finished answer.

Why flags happen

Why French writers get flagged by mistake

French has solid training data overall, but formal and administrative French sits unusually close to what this app is built to notice, and it's worth saying so rather than treating the tells as neutral.

Administrative French
Il convient de noter que, il est à noter que: the style administratif already leans on the same hedges and connectors for reasons that predate AI by a century.
Machine-translated French
Text translated from English by a tool like DeepL tends to be grammatically correct but stiff, missing the narrow-space typography native writing usually carries.
Careful non-native learners
En effet, par ailleurs and de plus are exactly what French courses teach as connective structure, so a learner following the lesson closely writes the same shape a model defaults to.

If it happens to you

What to do if your French writing gets wrongly flagged

A flag here is a signal, not a verdict, and copy-paste between systems routinely strips the exact typography this app looks for.

Keep every draft
Earlier versions are the clearest evidence a piece was built, not generated whole.
Check what your editor did to your apostrophes
Many tools silently convert U+2019 to a straight apostrophe on paste, turning a genuine signal into a false one.
Ask exactly what was flagged
A named pattern, a connector or a spacing habit, is something you can discuss. A bare score isn't.

Who it's for

Who uses the French AI detector, and what the free limit is

Editorial teams screening French submissions, teachers weighing in on unusually polished essays, and writers checking their own drafts before sending them out.

5 free checks in any rolling 24 hours, no account required. The window rolls forward rather than resetting on a clock, so five usually covers one submission or one flagged paragraph at a time.

FAQ

Everything answered. French AI detector FAQ

How do I check French text for AI writing?

Paste it into the checker and run it. You'll get a list of the patterns found, each with a reason, instead of a single pass or fail.

Is the French AI detector free?

Yes. 5 checks in any rolling 24 hours, with no account and nothing to buy.

How many free checks do I get?

Five per rolling 24-hour window. It rolls forward from your last check rather than resetting at a fixed hour.

Is my text uploaded anywhere?

It's sent to our AI server to be scored, and that's the extent of its use. Nothing is published or kept once the result is back.

Does it read Québécois, Belgian and African French too?

Yes. All are read, and regional register is one of the things the app weighs rather than filters out.

Is it accurate?

It reports signals and patterns, not proof, and no accuracy number is claimed anywhere on this page.

Can it prove a text was AI-written?

No. Nothing can. It points at patterns typical of machine-written French, a different, harder problem than proving authorship.

Will this help my text get past a checker?

No, and that isn't what it's for. It's built to show the signals, not to help anyone slip past them.

Does it identify which AI model wrote something?

No. Most models default to the same tidy register in French, so this app reads for machine-written French broadly rather than a specific model.

Why did my own formal writing get flagged?

Administrative French already leans on hedges like il convient de noter que for reasons that predate AI, and reads close to what the app is tuned to notice.

Does it flag machine-translated French?

Often, yes. French translated from English tends to be grammatically correct but stiff, missing the typography native writing usually carries.

Does guillemet spacing actually matter?

It's one signal among several. A missing narrow space before » or after «, or straight quotes used instead, is a small but real tell.

Does the apostrophe style affect the result?

It contributes. A document that's perfectly consistent with U+2019 or a straight apostrophe, never a mix, stands out slightly.

How is this different from the general AI detector?

This one is tuned to French-specific signals: guillemets, spacing and connector overuse. The general detector reads English phrasing patterns instead.

Is there an API or bulk checking?

Not yet. Checks run one at a time, up to 5 per rolling 24 hours.

Does the length of the sample matter?

Yes. A short line doesn't give the check much to go on. Longer samples produce a steadier read.

What should I do if I'm wrongly accused?

Keep drafts and version history, and check whether your editor silently changed your apostrophes on paste. A named signal can be discussed; an unexplained accusation can't.

Does it work on mobile?

Yes. The checker and its results both work fine in a phone browser.