Rewrite AI-drafted Italian so elision, accents and tu/lei register all land right. 5 free runs a day, no account.
Italian AI humanizer
Feed it Italian text a model drafted and it rewrites the details that give that away: elision applied inconsistently, accents dropped in copy-paste, and a register that drifts between formal lei and casual tu partway through.
It runs on our AI server: your text is sent, rewritten and returned in a few seconds. You get 5 free runs every rolling 24 hours, no account needed, and nothing is kept once the rewrite comes back to you.
What gives it away
Some of what marks Italian as generated is a small mechanical slip, and some of it is a register that reads stiffer than the situation calls for.
Workflow
Three steps, nothing to configure first.
Why it matters
No single missing elision stops a reader cold. It's the pile-up: register drifting between tu and lei, formal connectors opening every paragraph, and hedges repeated until they stop meaning anything.
In business correspondence that reads as inconsistent rather than polished, the kind of small mismatch that makes a client wonder who actually wrote the message. This app targets register and rhythm together so the result reads like one person wrote it, start to finish.
Being upfront
Italian training data is solid overall, so grammar and spelling come out correct. What's less reliable is regional nuance: Tuscan, Roman, Milanese and Southern Italian usage carry their own vocabulary and idiom that a rewrite tends to smooth into one standard, textbook Italian.
That flattening is a real cost even when nothing is technically wrong. It changes whose Italian the text sounds like, worth knowing before you rely on it for something meant to sound local rather than generic.
Straight answer
No. We don't test against AI detectors and can't promise what one will report on the result.
What it reliably does is fix elision and accents, hold register steady, and vary connectors. That's a real improvement in readability, detector or not.
In practice
Non-native Italian speakers who draft with a model because writing directly in Italian is slower, then want the register and elision checked before sending.
Students bringing an AI-assisted Italian essay back into their own voice, within their school's policy, and businesses localising into Italian who need a first AI draft not to read like a language-course exercise.
Paste it above and hit Humanize. It fixes elision and accents and holds register steady, returning the result in seconds.
Yes: 5 free runs every rolling 24 hours, no account needed to use any of them.
Five per rolling 24-hour window, coming back 24 hours after each specific run rather than at a fixed reset time.
It's sent to our AI server to be rewritten and returned to you. It isn't published or used to train models.
Yes, applying the apostrophe correctly before a vowel is one of the details it checks.
Yes, accents lost or reversed in copy-paste are corrected as part of the rewrite.
That's one of the things it's built to hold. If your original mixes the two, the rewrite settles on one register from context.
It can, but the default leans toward standard textbook Italian unless your text gives it clear regional cues to follow.
No, and that's not what it's built for. It changes how the Italian reads to a person, not how a detector scores it.
It shouldn't. Facts and names stay put; only register and phrasing move. Read the result before you use it.
The detector reads text and flags patterns marking it as machine-written. This app rewrites the text so fewer of those patterns are there.
Yes, within reason. Longer pieces take a bit longer, and checking in sections beats reviewing one long block.
It clears the obvious tells, not your personal voice. A short pass of your own afterward usually closes the gap.
Not yet. One piece of text at a time, within your 5-run daily allowance.
That's governed by your school's own policy on AI-assisted tools, which we don't set. Check with them first.
Yes, when it's repeated enough within a short passage to read as filler rather than doing real work.
Yes, when they're stacked as a default opener rather than doing real work in the argument.
Yes, it works fully in a phone browser and the layout stacks cleanly on smaller screens.
Yes. It works on the Italian text itself, regardless of which model or person wrote it.
It can, if the text doesn't carry strong regional signals for it to follow. That's a real limit worth knowing, not something the app claims to solve.
Read it against your original, confirm no name or number moved, and check the register held consistent from the very first line to the last.