Ready
0 chars · 0 words
free checks per 24 hours
5
not a verdict
Signals
needed to run a check
No account

Japanese AI detector

What the Japanese AI detector does

This app checks Japanese text for the patterns typical of AI-generated Japanese writing: register consistency between desu-masu and da-dearu, full-width punctuation, and stock closing lines like いかがでしたか. It's built for the exact question people search, is this Japanese text AI-written, and answers with a labelled list of signals instead of a bare score.

It runs as a server tool: your text goes to our AI server to be scored, and the flags come back explained. You get 5 free checks in any rolling 24 hours, no account needed.

The real tells

How AI-written Japanese text actually gives itself away

Japanese has its own tells that a checker built around English phrasing would never catch. None of them mean anything alone; the app reads for how many show up together.

The いかがでしたか closing
いかがでしたでしょうか wrapping up a piece that never needed the question, a template so common in AI-generated Japanese blog content that it has its own reputation among readers.
A register that never slips
です・ます kept polite throughout, or だ・である kept plain throughout, with none of the accidental mid-paragraph switching real drafts tend to have.
Suspiciously clean full-width punctuation
、。!? rendered perfectly full-width throughout, without the stray half-width ASCII punctuation ordinary typing sessions tend to introduce.
No word spacing, plus odd exceptions
Japanese carries no spaces between words. A stray space inserted around an English loanword or after a punctuation mark stands out precisely because the rest of the text has none.
A closing summary paragraph
A tidy wrap-up added to a piece that never asked for one, doing the same job いかがでしたか does even when that exact phrase is avoided.

Workflow

How to run the Japanese AI detector on your own text in three steps

Nothing to configure, no format to match.

1. Paste your Japanese text
A draft, a submission, a comment. A paragraph gives the check enough structure to read.
2. Run the check
The text goes to our AI server once, gets scored, and the flagged patterns come back to the page.
3. Read the flags, not just a score
Each signal ships with a plain-language reason. Use that to decide what the result means for your text.

Straight answer

Can you actually tell which AI wrote Japanese text?

Not for certain. Most models default to a polite, consistent desu-masu register in Japanese regardless of which one wrote it, and several share the same いかがでしたか-style closing habit, so this app reads for machine-written Japanese broadly, not for a single model.

Ask the same model for a plain, literary da-dearu register, or a casual tone, and much of that default shape disappears. Treat a match as worth a closer look, not as a finished answer.

Why flags happen

Why Japanese writers get flagged by mistake

Japanese has solid training data overall, but the writing that reads most like this app's default profile is exactly the writing that has nothing to do with AI.

Keigo-heavy business writing
Formal honorific Japanese in business correspondence already keeps a rigidly consistent polite register, for reasons that predate AI by decades.
Machine-translated Japanese
Japanese translated from English by a separate tool often lands as grammatically correct but stiff, matching this app's default profile.
Careful non-native learners
Desu-masu consistency is exactly what Japanese courses teach as the safe default, so a learner following the lesson closely writes the same shape a model defaults to.

If it happens to you

What to do if your Japanese writing gets wrongly flagged

A flag here is a signal, not a verdict, and formally consistent Japanese overlaps with this app's default profile more than casual writing does.

Keep every draft
Earlier versions are the clearest evidence a piece was built, not generated whole.
Note your intended register
Why you kept desu-masu or da-dearu strictly consistent, for a business or academic context, is something a generic default can't supply.
Ask exactly what was flagged
A named pattern, a closing phrase or a register choice, is something you can discuss. A bare score isn't.

Who it's for

Who uses the Japanese AI detector, and what the free limit is

Editorial teams screening Japanese submissions, teachers weighing in on unusually polished essays, and writers checking their own drafts before sending them out.

5 free checks in any rolling 24 hours, no account required. The window rolls forward rather than resetting on a clock, so five usually covers one submission or one flagged paragraph at a time.

FAQ

Everything answered. Japanese AI detector FAQ

How do I check Japanese text for AI writing?

Paste it into the checker and run it. You'll get a list of the patterns found, each with a reason, instead of a single pass or fail.

Is the Japanese AI detector free?

Yes. 5 checks in any rolling 24 hours, with no account and nothing to buy.

How many free checks do I get?

Five per rolling 24-hour window. It rolls forward from your last check rather than resetting at a fixed hour.

Is my text uploaded anywhere?

It's sent to our AI server to be scored, and that's the extent of its use. Nothing is published or kept once the result is back.

Does it check for the いかがでしたか closing specifically?

Yes. It's a well-known template in Japanese AI content, and its presence is one of the signals the app weighs.

Is it accurate?

It reports signals and patterns, not proof, and no accuracy number is claimed anywhere on this page.

Can it prove a text was AI-written?

No. Nothing can. It points at patterns typical of machine-written Japanese, a different, harder problem than proving authorship.

Will this help my text get past a checker?

No, and that isn't what it's for. It's built to show the signals, not to help anyone slip past them.

Does it identify which AI model wrote something?

No. Most models default to the same polite register in Japanese, so this app reads for machine-written Japanese broadly rather than a specific model.

Why did my own formal writing get flagged?

Keigo-heavy business Japanese already keeps a rigidly consistent polite register for reasons that predate AI.

Does it flag machine-translated Japanese?

Often, yes. Japanese translated from English tends to come out grammatically correct but stiff, the same shape this app looks for.

Does register consistency actually matter?

It's one signal among several. Desu-masu or da-dearu held perfectly throughout, with no accidental mid-paragraph switch, is a small but real tell.

Does punctuation width affect the result?

It contributes. Flawlessly full-width punctuation throughout, with no stray half-width marks, is one of several signals.

How is this different from the general AI detector?

This one is tuned to Japanese-specific signals: register, punctuation width and closing templates. The general detector reads English phrasing patterns instead.

Is there an API or bulk checking?

Not yet. Checks run one at a time, up to 5 per rolling 24 hours.

Does the length of the sample matter?

Yes. A short line doesn't give the check much to go on. Longer samples produce a steadier read.

What should I do if I'm wrongly accused?

Keep drafts and version history, and note your intended register. A named signal can be discussed; an unexplained accusation can't.

Does it work on mobile?

Yes. The checker and its results both work fine in a phone browser.