Cut Llama's exclamation points and restated news for a release stated once, plainly. Free app, 5 runs every 24 hours, no account.
Press release polisher
Paste in a press release Llama drafted and this app rewrites it so the news is stated once, plainly, instead of the exclamation points and restated announcement Llama tends to work in. Every fact, figure, name and date stays exactly as supplied.
It's a server tool: your text goes to our AI server to get rewritten and comes back a few seconds later. You get 5 free runs every 24 hours on a rolling window, nothing to sign up for.
The tell
An editor scanning a crowded inbox notices fast when a warm, enthusiastic chatbot register shows up in a genre with no room for it.
How it works
Three steps, and nothing to configure first.
What changes
The rewrite drops exclamation points, removes the news restated a second time, and trims the quote back to a specific, citable statement rather than generic reassurance, so the whole release reads with one consistent, credible voice.
It doesn't verify, add, or check a single fact, figure, date, name or claim. That responsibility stays entirely with you and whoever approved the release before it went to this app.
Why it happens
Llama defaults to a warm, agreeable register across most tasks, useful in a back-and-forth conversation and a mismatch for a genre read fast and skeptically by an editor deciding what's worth covering.
The same tendency toward thoroughness shows up as restating an announcement in different words, when an editor scanning quickly just sees the same fact twice.
Straight answer
No, on both counts. This app rewrites the wording you give it. It can't check a figure, confirm a quote, or verify a claim about your product or company. That's on you before the release goes anywhere.
It also can't promise coverage. What it reliably does is turn a repeated announcement into news stated once, plainly, which is a real improvement on its own.
In practice
Startup founders and small comms teams who got back something that reads like an enthusiastic reply rather than a release an editor takes seriously.
A quick check before sending catches anything the rewrite couldn't have known to verify.
Paste the full release above and hit Polish. It comes back stating the news once, plainly, within seconds.
Yes: 5 free runs every 24 hours, no account required.
No. It rewrites wording only. Verifying every fact and claim is entirely on you before it goes out.
No tool can promise that. Coverage depends on the news itself, not the polish.
It defaults to a warm, enthusiastic chatbot register, a tone that reads as unfocused in a genre built for a fast, skeptical read.
It tends toward being thorough and reassuring, which shows up as repeating the announcement in different words.
It rewrites wording so a quote reads as specific and citable rather than generic reassurance, but it doesn't invent new words for someone who didn't say them.
The structure stays; boilerplate gets the same repetition and tone correction as the rest of the release.
It's sent to our AI server to be rewritten and returned, and isn't used to train models.
Yes, the same restated-news pattern shows up across announcement types.
It shouldn't add a new factual claim. Remove or correct anything that reads as saying more than you gave it.
5 per rolling 24-hour window, refreshing 24 hours after each specific run.
Not a claim we make. We don't test against detectors or tune the rewrite to beat one.
No hard cap, but a very long release is easier to verify checked in sections.
No, it rewrites wording. House style and formatting checks are still yours to run.
Not yet. Releases run through one at a time, within your daily allowance.
This one targets Llama's exclamation-point and restated-news habit specifically. A ChatGPT or Claude draft fits that model's own version better.
It works on the body copy. Include the headline and it gets the same treatment; it won't write one from scratch.
Yes, fully, in any modern mobile browser.
Fact-check every figure and confirm the quote with whoever is named before distribution.
It's built and tested primarily for English. Other languages may work, but quality isn't guaranteed to the same degree.
Usually, since removing a restated announcement tends to cut length rather than add it.